The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced us many harsh classes. Importantly, it has proven us how simple it’s to fabricate panic and control entire populations through deceptive means. Topping the record of misleading methods is using a take a look at that falsely labels wholesome people as sick and infectious. This permits mass testing to drive the narrative that we’re in a deadly pandemic.
Of course, I am speaking in regards to the now notorious reverse transcription polymerase chain response (RT-PCR) take a look at. The actual fact is, the PCR take a look at will not be designed to be used as a diagnostic software because it can not distinguish between inactive viruses and “dwell” or reproductive ones.1
This can be a essential level, since inactive and reproductive viruses aren’t interchangeable when it comes to infectivity. If in case you have a nonreproductive virus in your physique, you’ll not get sick and you can’t unfold it to others. Secondly, many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many instances, which leads to wholesome folks testing “constructive.”
The Essential Element That Nullifies Most PCR Check Outcomes
The video above explains how the PCR take a look at works and the way we’re deciphering outcomes incorrectly. In abstract, the PCR swab collects RNA out of your nasal cavity. This RNA is then reverse transcribed into DNA. As a result of its tiny dimension, it have to be amplified to turn out to be discernible. Every spherical of amplification is named a cycle, and the variety of amplification cycles utilized by any given take a look at or lab is named a cycle threshold (CT).
The upper the CT, the better the danger that insignificant sequences of viral DNA find yourself being magnified to the purpose that the take a look at reads constructive even when your viral load is extraordinarily low or the virus is inactive and poses no risk to you or anybody else.
Many scientists have famous that something over 35 cycles is scientifically indefensible.2,3,4 A September 28, 2020, research5 in Scientific Infectious Ailments revealed that if you run a PCR take a look at at a CT of 35 or larger, the accuracy drops to three%, leading to a 97% false constructive charge.
But, a take a look at generally known as the Corman-Drosten paper and exams really helpful by the World Well being Group are set to 45 cycles,6,7,8 and the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration and the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention suggest operating PCR exams at a CT of 40.9
The query is why, contemplating the consensus is that CTs over 35 render the take a look at ineffective. When labs use these extreme cycle thresholds, you clearly find yourself with a grossly overestimated variety of constructive exams, so what we’re actually coping with is a “casedemic”10,11 — an epidemic of false positives.
Many are actually questioning whether or not this was finished on goal to crash the worldwide economic system and present cowl for the implementation of what is generally known as the Great Reset, which is nothing lower than a global totalitarian takeover by unelected technocrats who search to gobble up all of the world’s belongings.
Certainly, it appears fairly clear we’re not coping with a deadly pandemic in any actual sense. Mortality statistics additional show that is the case, as general mortality statistics have remained secure in 2020 and in keeping with earlier years.12,13,14
In different phrases, individuals are dying from COVID-19, sure, however the sickness will not be killing an extra variety of folks. The identical variety of folks would have died anyway, from one thing. Certainly, CDC knowledge15 launched August 26, 2020, confirmed solely 6% of so-called COVID-19 deaths had COVID-19 listed as the only real trigger on the loss of life certificates.
“For deaths with situations or causes as well as to COVID-19, on common, there have been 2.6 further situations or causes per loss of life,” the CDC acknowledged, and any a type of comorbidities may have killed these folks even when COVID-19 was nonexistent.
For Accuracy, A lot Decrease CTs Should Be Used
Now, if CTs above 35 are scientifically unjustified, simply how low of a CT ought to be used? Fairly a few research have investigated this, so there isn’t any scarcity of information at this level. The truth that the WHO, FDA and CDC nonetheless haven’t modified their CTs downward in mild of all these knowledge tells us they are not considering getting an correct image of the an infection charge.
For instance, an April 2020 research16 within the European Journal of Scientific Microbiology & Infectious Ailments confirmed that to get 100% confirmed actual positives, the PCR take a look at have to be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically.
By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy charge is a mere 20%, that means 80% are false positives. Past 34 cycles, your likelihood of a constructive PCR take a look at being a true constructive shrinks to zero.
Extra just lately, a December 3, 2020, systematic evaluation17 revealed within the journal of Scientific Infectious Ailments assessed the findings of 29 completely different research — all of which had been revealed in 2020 — evaluating proof of SARS-CoV-2 an infection with the CTs utilized in testing.
As reported by the authors, “12 research reported that CT values had been considerably decrease … in specimens producing dwell virus tradition.” In different phrases, the upper the CT, the decrease the possibility of a constructive take a look at truly being because of the presence of dwell (and infectious) virus.
“Two research reported the chances of dwell virus tradition decreased by roughly 33% for each one unit improve in CT,” the authors famous. Importantly, 5 of the research included had been unable to establish any dwell viruses in circumstances the place a constructive PCR take a look at had used a CT above 24. What’s extra, as a way to produce dwell virus tradition, a affected person whose PCR take a look at used a CT at or above 35 needed to be symptomatic.
So, to summarize, when you’ve got signs of COVID-19 and take a look at constructive utilizing a PCR take a look at that was run at 35 amplification cycles or larger, then you might be more likely to be contaminated and infectious.
Nevertheless, for those who don’t have signs, but take a look at constructive utilizing a PCR take a look at run at 35 CTs or larger, then it’s doubtless a false constructive and also you pose no danger to others as you are unlikely to hold any dwell virus. In reality, supplied you are asymptomatic, you are unlikely to be infectious even for those who take a look at constructive with a take a look at run at 24 CTs or larger.
Fearmongering Success Hinges on Incorrect Use of PCR Check
The video above consists of a number of interviews with consultants who’ve brazenly criticized using PCR testing to diagnose infections reminiscent of COVID-19. These embody:
The inventor of the PCR take a look at, the late Kary Mullis (he has spoken in regards to the take a look at for different infections, reminiscent of HIV, however died in August 2019, a number of months earlier than the COVID-19 pandemic broke out)
Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug firm Pfizer
Professor Carl Heneghan, director of the Oxford College Heart for Proof-Based mostly Medication
Emeritus professor of immunology Beda M. Stadler, former head of the Bern Institute of Immunology
Clare Craig, a guide pathologist
Stephen A. Bustin, professor of molecular drugs and a world-renowned skilled on the PCR take a look at
In 1993, Mullis spoke about using the PCR take a look at to diagnose HIV. He defined that every one the take a look at does is amplify molecules into one thing you may detect, but it surely can not inform you whether or not these particles truly pose a danger to your well being.
He additionally factors out that, utilizing PCR, you may primarily discover absolutely anything in anybody as a result of most of us are strolling round with pathogens of all kinds, however the load is both too low to be of concern or the particles are simply useless particles that pose no danger.
Bustin factors out that if you get a constructive end result utilizing a CT of 35 or larger, you are wanting on the equal of a single copy of viral DNA. The chance of that inflicting a well being drawback is minuscule. Even Dr. Anthony Fauci has admitted that utilizing a PCR take a look at with a CT above 35 renders it roughly ineffective as a result of at that time, you are simply detecting useless nucelotides. No dwell virus may be detected at CTs that top.
Deadly Errors Present in Paper on Which PCR Testing Is Based mostly
November 30, 2020, a workforce of twenty-two worldwide scientists revealed a evaluation18 difficult the scientific paper19 on PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 written by Christian Drosten, Ph.D., and Victor Corman. The Corman-Drosten paper was rapidly accepted by the WHO and the workflow described therein was adopted as the usual internationally.
In response to Reiner Fuellmich,20 founding member of the German Corona Further-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss,21 or ACU),22,23 Drosten is a key wrongdoer within the COVID-19 pandemic hoax.
The scientists demand the Corman-Drosten paper be retracted attributable to “deadly errors,”24 one in every of which is the truth that it was written (and the take a look at itself developed) earlier than any viral isolate was obtainable. All they used was the genetic sequence revealed on-line by Chinese language scientists in January 2020.
The truth that the paper was revealed a mere 24 hours after it was submitted additionally suggests it did not even bear peer evaluation. In an Undercover DC interview, Kevin Corbett, Ph.D., one of many 22 scientists who are actually demanding the paper’s retraction, acknowledged:25
“Each scientific rationale for the event of that take a look at has been completely destroyed by this paper. It is like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the COVID take a look at.
When Drosten developed the take a look at, China hadn’t given them a viral isolate. They developed the take a look at from a sequence in a gene financial institution. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. That they had a code, however no physique for the code. No viral morphology.
Within the fish market, it is like supplying you with a number of bones and saying ‘that is your fish.’ It might be any fish … Pay attention, the Corman-Drosten paper, there’s nothing from a affected person in it. It is all from gene banks. And the bits of the virus sequence that weren’t there they made up.
They synthetically created them to fill within the blanks. That is what genetics is; it is a code. So, its ABBBCCDDD and also you’re lacking some, what you assume is EEE, so you place it in … That is principally a pc virus.
There are 10 deadly errors on this Drosten take a look at paper … However right here is the underside line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they had been doing. The PCR merchandise of the amplification did not correspond to any viral isolate at the moment. I name it ‘donut ring science.’ There may be nothing on the middle of it. It is all about code, genetics, nothing to do with actuality …
There have since been papers saying they’ve produced viral isolates. However there aren’t any controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July … the place they mentioned: ‘This is the viral isolate.’ Have you learnt what they did? They swabbed one individual. One individual, who’d been to China and had chilly signs. One individual. They usually assumed he had [COVID-19] to start with. So, it is all filled with holes, the entire thing.“
The conclusion of the evaluation reads, partially:26
“A choice to acknowledge the errors obvious within the Corman-Drosten paper has the profit to significantly decrease human value and struggling going ahead. Is it not in the perfect curiosity of Eurosurveillance to retract this paper? Our conclusion is evident. Within the face of all of the large PCR-protocol design flaws and errors described right here, we conclude: There may be not a lot of a selection left within the framework of scientific integrity and duty.”
The critique in opposition to PCR testing is additional strengthened by a November 20, 2020, research27 in Nature Communications, which discovered no viable virus in PCR-positive circumstances at all. The research evaluated knowledge from 9,865,404 residents of Wuhan, China, who had undergone PCR testing between Could 14 and June 1, 2020.
A complete of 300 examined constructive however had no signs. Of the 34,424 folks with a historical past of COVID-19, 107 examined constructive a second time. But, after they did virus cultures on these 407 people who had examined constructive (both for the first or second time), no dwell virus was present in any of them!
Antibody Checks Are Equally Unreliable
Antibody exams are additionally turning out to have their share of high quality issues. If in case you have antibodies in opposition to SARS-CoV-2, that will be proof that your immune system efficiently overcame the virus in some unspecified time in the future previously. Nevertheless, the COVID-19 antibody take a look at may additionally end up constructive when you’ve got antibodies in opposition to frequent chilly viruses.
June 30, 2020, the CDC admitted that prior publicity to coronaviruses accountable for the frequent chilly can lead to a constructive COVID-19 antibody take a look at, even for those who’ve by no means been uncovered to SARS-CoV-2 particularly.28
The saving grace is that research29,30,31 counsel antibodies produced following publicity to coronaviruses that trigger the frequent chilly additionally seem to offer some common and long-lasting resistance in opposition to SARS-CoV-2.
One such research,32,33 revealed Could 14, 2020, within the journal Cell, discovered 70% of samples from sufferers who had recovered from gentle circumstances of COVID-19 had resistance to SARS-CoV-2 on the T-cell stage, as did 40% to 60% of individuals who had not been uncovered to SARS-CoV-2.
In response to the authors, this implies there’s “cross-reactive T cell recognition between circulating ‘frequent chilly’ coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2.” In different phrases, for those who’ve recovered from a standard chilly attributable to a specific coronavirus, your humoral immune system could activate if you encounter SARS-CoV-2, thus rendering you proof against COVID-19.
One other research34 found SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies are solely present in probably the most extreme circumstances — about 1 in 5. So, a damaging antibody take a look at would not essentially rule out the chance that you have been contaminated and did not get sick. In reality, this discovering suggests COVID-19 could truly be 5 instances extra prevalent than suspected — and 5 instances much less lethal than predicted.
In a letter to the editor35 revealed within the July 1, 2020, subject of American Household Doctor, Drs. Mark Ebell, deputy editor for evidence-based drugs for the journal, and Henry Barry, reviewed among the obtainable knowledge, noting that:
“When assessing whether or not sufferers had a earlier an infection and could also be immune, it is very important keep away from false-positives in order that sufferers don’t assume they’re immune when they aren’t.
Desk 1 summarizes the false-positive charges at numerous inhabitants prevalence for the Cellex take a look at and for a hypothetical take a look at that’s 90% delicate and 99% particular. At comparatively low inhabitants prevalences, which doubtless mirror present situations in the USA and elsewhere, we’d argue that false-positive charges are unacceptably excessive with the Cellex take a look at.”
Ebell and Barry identified that lots of the antibody tests which have provisional approval from the FDA nonetheless haven’t even been evaluated for accuracy. In addition they really helpful that labs report take a look at outcomes “in a method that displays the native inhabitants prevalence based mostly on widespread testing and embody the false-positive charge,” as this data “is required to assist household physicians higher inform shared decision-making concerning earlier an infection and return to work or college.”
At current, you’d be hard-pressed to seek out anybody together with that knowledge of their reporting, and the method issues are going, I would not maintain my breath in anticipation of such useful numbers being included sooner or later both.
Excessive Time to Finish Mass Testing Rip-off
If the huge majority of people that take a look at constructive for COVID-19 an infection haven’t any signs, do not feel sick and do not look sick, is COVID-19 actually a “lethal” illness? Or, is it extra like HPV — a viral an infection that most individuals have with out understanding it, and which 90% are capable of eradicate with out therapy?
The first justification for the tyrannical governmental interventions of COVID-19 was to gradual the unfold of the an infection in order that hospital sources wouldn’t be overwhelmed, inflicting folks to die attributable to lack of medical care.
These interventions weren’t about stopping the unfold altogether and even decreasing the variety of folks that will finally get contaminated. They actually had been by no means meant to stop all loss of life. Any rational evaluation would quickly conclude that this merely is not potential, underneath any circumstance.
Quick-term stay-at-home orders and enterprise closings had been solely supposed to decelerate the unfold so that, finally, naturally-acquired herd immunity — the perfect form — would forestall it from reemerging. But the purpose posts maintain shifting as we go alongside.
Two-week lockdowns was months in some areas. Ultimately, we had been advised the whole lot would return to regular as quickly as a vaccine grew to become obtainable. However as soon as the vaccines began rolling out, the narrative modified once more, and we had been advised we would nonetheless want masks, social distancing and lockdowns effectively into 2021 and even 2022 even with a vaccine. What, precisely, is happening?
The one rational motive for why authorities interventions proceed is as a result of they’re meant to erode our private freedoms and civil liberties and switch wealth to unelected technocrats who’re controlling the pandemic narrative. It is all fearmongering based mostly on a mix of wildly manipulated knowledge and flawed exams.
Other than PCR testing knowledge, there isn’t any proof of a deadly pandemic in any respect. As talked about, whereas there’s such a factor as COVID-19, and other people have and do die from it, there aren’t any extra deaths attributable to it.36,37,38 The entire mortality for 2020 is regular.
So, until we assume we should always shut down the world and cease residing as a result of folks die from coronary heart illness, diabetes, most cancers, the flu or anything, then there isn’t any motive to close down the world as a result of some folks occur to die from COVID-19.
What You Can Do
The excellent news is the hoax is beginning to be uncovered. In November 2020, a Portuguese appeals court docket dominated39,40 that the PCR take a look at is “not a dependable take a look at for SARS-CoV-2” and that “a single constructive PCR take a look at can’t be used as an efficient prognosis of an infection.” Subsequently, “any enforced quarantine based mostly on the outcomes is illegal.”41 The court docket additionally famous that forcing wholesome folks to self-isolate might be a violation of their elementary proper to liberty.
As detailed in “Coronavirus Fraud Scandal — The Biggest Fight Has Just Begun” and “German Lawyers Initiate Class-Action Coronavirus Litigation,” further authorized circumstances are additionally to be anticipated, all of which is able to assist expose the fraud perpetrated. As for what you can do within the meantime, think about:
- Turning off mainstream media information and turning to unbiased consultants — do the analysis. Learn by way of the science.
- Proceed to counter the censorship by asking questions — arm your self with mortality statistics and the information on PCR testing, so you may clarify how and why this pandemic merely is not a pandemic anymore.
- In case you are a medical skilled, particularly for those who’re a member of knowledgeable society, write an open letter to your authorities, urging them to talk to and heed suggestions from unbiased consultants.
- Signal The Great Barrington Declaration,42 which requires an finish to lockdowns.
- Be part of a bunch so that you simply can have help — Examples of teams fashioned to battle in opposition to authorities overreach embody Us for Them, a bunch campaigning for reopening colleges and defending kids’s rights within the U.Ok., and the Freedom to Breathe Agency, a U.S. workforce of attorneys, docs, enterprise homeowners and fogeys who’re preventing to guard freedom and liberty.